IBM Journal of Research and Development · 2012 · 99 citations · 15 references
ComputingComputer ScienceArtificial IntelligenceMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingDeep LearningEvidence-based AssessmentExpert SystemsQuestion AnsweringVisual Question AnsweringAnswer RankingEvidence CombinationNeural Question AnsweringQuestion Answering SystemsQuestion Answering Systems Evaluation
The final stage in the IBM DeepQA pipeline involves ranking all candidate answers according to their evidence scores and judging the likelihood that each candidate answer is correct. In DeepQA, this is done using a machine learning framework that is phase-based, providing capabilities for manipulating the data and applying machine learning in successive applications. We show how this design can be used to implement solutions to particular challenges that arise in applying machine learning for evidence-based hypothesis evaluation. Our approach facilitates an agile development environment for DeepQA; evidence scoring strategies can be easily introduced, revised, and reconfigured without the need for error-prone manual effort to determine how to combine the various evidence scores. We describe the framework, explain the challenges, and evaluate the gain over a baseline machine learning approach.
15
David H. Wolpert · Neural Networks · 1992 · 7.5K citations
Adaptive Mixtures of Local Experts
Robert A. Jacobs, Michael I. Jordan, Steven J. Nowlan et al. · Neural Computation · 1991 · 5K citations
DBpedia - A crystallization point for the Web of Data
Christian Bizer, Jens Lehmann, Georgi Kobilarov et al. · Journal of Web Semantics · 2009 · 2.2K citations
Christopher G. Atkeson, Andrew Moore, Stefan Schaal · Artificial Intelligence Review · 1997 · 1.7K citations
A probabilistic approach to feature selection - a filter solution
Huan Liu, Rudy Setiono · 1996 · 660 citations