Journal of Animal Science · 1989 · 29 citations · 4 references
AgricultureAnimal SciencesNutritional SciencesAnimal NutritionNutrient ManagementRuminant NutritionConcentrate FeedingFeed CompositionLivestock NutritionNutrient RequirementsSheep NutritionSmall Ruminant NutritionAnimal Diet EffectsConcentrate FeedsEnergy Intake ReductionFeed Restriction EffectsLamb Growth PerformanceLamb NutritionReduced Feed IntakeTotal Energy Intake
Two hundred ninety-eight Rambouillet ewe and wether lambs approximately 9 mo old from Texas were allotted to pens (29 to 30 lambs/pen). Two replicate pens were fed each of five diets. Two methods of restricting energy intake were evaluated: altering nutrient density (55% vs 72.5% vs 90% concentrate levels) and restricting intake of the 90% concentrate pelleted diet (92.5% or 85% ad libitum intake). Daily gains were highest with the 72.5% concentrate level and feed efficiency was poorest with the 55% concentrate diet fed ad libitum. Altering nutrient density did not reduce energy intake because lambs compensated by increasing feed intake at the lower nutrient densities. Actual feed intake was 89.5% of ad libitum for the 92.5% of ad libitum intake level and 84% of ad libitum at the 85% of ad libitum intake level due to refusal to consume some fines from the 90% concentrate diet. Feed refusal was greatest for lambs with ad libitum access to feed. Average daily gain was depressed by 8% at the 85% intake level. However, feed efficiency was improved (P less than .01) by 20% when intake was restricted to 92.5% of the ad libitum intake level. Differences in carcass traits were small, but consistent; carcass fat content was reduced slightly by restricting feed intake at constant slaughter weight.
4
Manipulating Metabolic Parameters to Improve Growth Rate and Milk Secretion
R.L. Baldwin, N.E. Smith, Jennifer Taylor et al. · Journal of Animal Science · 1980 · 201 citations
Programming feed intake to optimize performance of feedlot cattle
R. A. Zinn · 1987 · 15 citations