Distinguishing knowledge-sharing, knowledge-construction, and knowledge-creation discourses

Jan van Aalst

International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · 2009 · 326 citations · 63 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

The study aimed to clarify the asynchronous computer‑mediated discourse required for Bereiter and Scardamalia’s knowledge‑creation model. The authors distinguished knowledge‑sharing, knowledge‑construction, and knowledge‑creation discourses, applied this coding to asynchronous online discussions of 40 secondary students about SARS, and used pretests and collaborative summary notes to assess group performance. The best summary note emerged from a threshold knowledge‑creation discourse, while other groups engaged in knowledge‑sharing or hybrid modes, and the authors propose strategies to cultivate knowledge‑creation discourse.

Abstract

The study reported here sought to obtain the clear articulation of asynchronous computer-mediated discourse needed for Carl Bereiter and Marlene Scardamalia's knowledge-creation model. Distinctions were set up between three modes of discourse: knowledge sharing, knowledge construction, and knowledge creation. These were applied to the asynchronous online discourses of four groups of secondary school students (40 students in total) who studied aspects of an outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) and related topics. The participants completed a pretest of relevant knowledge and a collaborative summary note in Knowledge Forum, in which they self-assessed their collective knowledge advances. A coding scheme was then developed and applied to the group discourses to obtain a possible explanation of the between-group differences in the performance of the summary notes and examine the discourses as examples of the three modes. The findings indicate that the group with the best summary note was involved in a threshold knowledge-creation discourse. Of the other groups, one engaged in a knowledge-sharing discourse and the discourses of other two groups were hybrids of all three modes. Several strategies for cultivating knowledge-creation discourse are proposed.

References

63