American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology · 2000 · 124 citations · 26 references
MedicineBiochemistryPharmacologyMolecular PharmacologyStructural BiochemistryStructural BiologyConformational SelectionLigand BindingReceptor BindingReceptor PharmacologyReceptor PhysiologyReceptor-ligand InteractionsCircular DichroismLigand DissociationMolecular Conformation In SolutionNuclear Magnetic Resonance StudiesPrimary StructuresReceptor Conformational RegulationReceptor Subtype SpecificityReceptor-ligand Selectivity
We synthesized PYY-(1-36) (nonselective between Y(1) and Y(2) receptor subtype agonists), [Pro(34)]PYY (selective for Y(1)), and PYY-(3-36) (selective for Y(2)) to determine whether solution conformation plays a role in receptor subtype selectivity. The three peptides exhibited the expected specificities in displacing labeled PYY-(1-36) from cells transfected with Y(1) receptors (dissociation constants = 0.42, 0.21, and 1,050 nM, respectively) and from cells transfected with Y(2) receptors (dissociation constants = 0.03, 710, and 0.11 nM, respectively) for PYY-(1-36), [Pro(34)]PYY, and PYY-(3-36). Sedimentation equilibrium analyses revealed that the three PYY analogs were 80-90% monomer at the concentrations used for the subsequent circular dichroism (CD) and (1)H-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies. CD analysis measured helicities for PYY-(1-36), [Pro(34)]PYY, and PYY-(3-36) of 42%, 31%, and 24%, suggesting distinct differences in secondary structure. The backbone (1)H-NMR resonances of the three peptides further substantiated marked conformational differences. These patterns support the hypothesis that Y(1) and Y(2) receptor subtype binding affinities depend on the secondary and tertiary solution state structures of PYY and its analogs.
26
J. Brontë Gatenby, T. N. Tahmisian · Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society · 1957 · 536 citations