Institutional Motives for Serving in the U.S. Army National Guard

James Griffith

Armed Forces & Society · 2007 · 103 citations · 20 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study extends prior work on motivations of American youth and active‑duty soldiers to serve in the military. The study uses a sample of Army reservists to examine their reasons for joining, differing from previous research that focused on active‑duty soldiers. Institutionally‑motivated reservists are more likely to stay in service, report for duty to support peers and family, and believe in the national mission, whereas materially‑motivated reservists are less likely to remain if deployed overseas, report mainly to meet contractual obligations and avoid discipline, and are less inclined to serve the country; these differences affect commitment and combat readiness.

Abstract

The present study extended recent investigations of the motivations of American youth and active-duty soldiers to serve in the military. Unlike previous studies, this study employed a sample of reservists and examined their reasons for joining. Consistent with recent studies, institutionally-motivated soldiers were more likely to plan to remain in military service, would report for duty so they did not let their buddies and family down, and believed in the mission and service to the country. In contrast, materially-motivated soldiers were less likely to remain in reserve military service if deployed overseas, more likely to report for duty to meet contractual obligations and to avoid disciplinary actions, but less likely to report to serve the country. These factors have implications for the level of commitment and combat readiness of soldiers, in particular Army reservists, who are increasingly relied on for national defense strategy.

References

20