Publication | Closed Access
An Assessment of the Dimensionality of Three SAT-Verbal Test Editions
33
Citations
31
References
1988
Year
Systematic Dimensionality AssessmentEducationItem Response TheoryPsycholinguisticsCognitionOn-line TestingPsychometricsSocial SciencesPsychologyLanguage TestingCognitive DevelopmentFactor AnalysisClassroom AssessmentEffective DimensionalityTestabilityAutomated AssessmentPsychological EvaluationCognitive FactorReliabilityCognitive ScienceTest DevelopmentExperimental PsychologyDimensionality MethodologyElectronic AssessmentEducational Assessment
A strong assumption made by most commonly used item response theory (IRT) models is that the data are unidimensional, that is, statistical dependence among item scores can be explained by a single ability dimension. First-order and second-order factor analyses were conducted on correlation matrices among item parcels of SAT-Verbal items. The item parcels were constructed to yield correlation matrices that were amenable to linear factor analyses. The first-order analyses were employed to assess the effective dimensionality of the item parcel data. Second-order analyses were employed to test meaningful hypotheses about the structure of the data. Parcels were constructed for three SAT-Verbal editions. The dimensionality analyses revealed that one SAT-Verbal test edition was less parallel to the other two editions than these other editions were to each other. Refinements in the dimensionality methodology and a more systematic dimensionality assessment are logical extensions of the present research.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
1969 | 8.1K | |
1981 | 2.3K | |
1984 | 2K | |
1957 | 1.1K | |
1985 | 1K | |
1970 | 614 | |
1981 | 506 | |
1978 | 497 | |
1975 | 396 | |
1961 | 337 |
Page 1
Page 1