The Journal of Pathology · 2012 · 64 citations · 75 references
Life SciencesGeneticsOncologyCancer GeneticsDna RepairMolecular OncologyCancer Genome SequencingCancer GenomicsGermline Cancer PredispositionGermline Cancer SusceptibilityNext-generation Sequencing In OncologyOncogene MutationsBrca MutationsBrca1 InactivationBrca1 Mutation RiskBrca1-mediated RepairBreast Cancer GenomicsGermline MutationsMutational Signature AnalysisTp53 Mutations
BRCA1 encodes a tumour suppressor protein that plays pivotal roles in homologous recombination (HR) DNA repair, cell-cycle checkpoints, and transcriptional regulation. BRCA1 germline mutations confer a high risk of early-onset breast and ovarian cancer. In more than 80% of cases, tumours arising in BRCA1 germline mutation carriers are oestrogen receptor (ER)-negative; however, up to 15% are ER-positive. It has been suggested that BRCA1 ER-positive breast cancers constitute sporadic cancers arising in the context of a BRCA1 germline mutation rather than being causally related to BRCA1 loss-of-function. Whole-genome massively parallel sequencing of ER-positive and ER-negative BRCA1 breast cancers, and their respective germline DNAs, was used to characterize the genetic landscape of BRCA1 cancers at base-pair resolution. Only BRCA1 germline mutations, somatic loss of the wild-type allele, and TP53 somatic mutations were recurrently found in the index cases. BRCA1 breast cancers displayed a mutational signature consistent with that caused by lack of HR DNA repair in both ER-positive and ER-negative cases. Sequencing analysis of independent cohorts of hereditary BRCA1 and sporadic non-BRCA1 breast cancers for the presence of recurrent pathogenic mutations and/or homozygous deletions found in the index cases revealed that DAPK3, TMEM135, KIAA1797, PDE4D, and GATA4 are potential additional drivers of breast cancers. This study demonstrates that BRCA1 pathogenic germline mutations coupled with somatic loss of the wild-type allele are not sufficient for hereditary breast cancers to display an ER-negative phenotype, and has led to the identification of three potential novel breast cancer genes (ie DAPK3, TMEM135, and GATA4).
75
The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools
Heng Li, Alec Wysoker, Tim Fennell et al. · Bioinformatics · 2009 · 67.5K citations · Full text
SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function
P.C. Ng · Nucleic Acids Research · 2003 · 6.9K citations · Full text
A Gene-Expression Signature as a Predictor of Survival in Breast Cancer
Marc J. van de Vijver, Yudong D. He, Laura van ‘t Veer et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2002 · 6.5K citations · Full text
Medicine, Bioinformatics, Oncology +17
Supervised Risk Predictor of Breast Cancer Based on Intrinsic Subtypes
Joel S. Parker, Michael E. Mullins, Maggie C.U. Cheang et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2009 · 4.9K citations · Full text
Medicine, Bioinformatics, Oncology +16
The Consensus Coding Sequences of Human Breast and Colorectal Cancers
Tobias Sjöblom, Siân Jones, Laura D. Wood et al. · Science · 2006 · 3.2K citations