Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

Requirement of the Chemokine Receptor CXCR3 for Acute Allograft Rejection

616

Citations

14

References

2000

Year

TLDR

Chemokines recruit inflammatory cells via G protein–coupled receptors, but overlapping ligand–receptor interactions raise concerns about functional redundancy. Three in vivo models were used to demonstrate that CXCR3 is required for transplant rejection. CXCR3 deficiency or blockade protects mice from acute cardiac allograft rejection and prolongs graft survival, and CXCR3 is expressed in human rejecting grafts, indicating its central role in T‑cell–mediated rejection.

Abstract

Chemokines provide signals for activation and recruitment of effector cells into sites of inflammation, acting via specific G protein–coupled receptors. However, in vitro data demonstrating the presence of multiple ligands for a given chemokine receptor, and often multiple receptors for a given chemokine, have led to concerns of biologic redundancy. Here we show that acute cardiac allograft rejection is accompanied by progressive intragraft production of the chemokines interferon (IFN)-γ–inducible protein of 10 kD (IP-10), monokine induced by IFN-γ (Mig), and IFN-inducible T cell α chemoattractant (I-TAC), and by infiltration of activated T cells bearing the corresponding chemokine receptor, CXCR3. We used three in vivo models to demonstrate a role for CXCR3 in the development of transplant rejection. First, CXCR3-deficient (CXCR3−/−) mice showed profound resistance to development of acute allograft rejection. Second, CXCR3−/− allograft recipients treated with a brief, subtherapeutic course of cyclosporin A maintained their allografts permanently and without evidence of chronic rejection. Third, CXCR+/+ mice treated with an anti-CXCR3 monoclonal antibody showed prolongation of allograft survival, even if begun after the onset of rejection. Taken in conjunction with our findings of CXCR3 expression in rejecting human cardiac allografts, we conclude that CXCR3 plays a key role in T cell activation, recruitment, and allograft destruction.

References

YearCitations

1996

1.2K

1998

873

1987

684

1998

457

1996

411

1995

376

2000

251

1998

240

1993

189

1996

180

Page 1