Publication | Closed Access
Using Athletes as Endorsers to Sell Women’s Sport: Attractiveness vs. Expertise
132
Citations
32
References
2004
Year
Match-up HypothesisBehavioral Decision MakingSocial PsychologyConsumer ResearchSocial InfluenceAttractiveness VsSports ConsumptionSocial SciencesInterpersonal AttractionGender StudiesBiasManagementAthlete AttractivenessSell Women ’Sport ParticipationBehavioral SciencesFan LoyaltyMotivationApplied Social PsychologyMarketingSports MarketingAthletic TrainingPerformance StudiesSocial BehaviorAthlete ExpertiseSport EconomicsSport PsychologyPersuasion
This study drew from the match-up hypothesis and associated learning theory to examine the effects of athlete attractiveness and athlete expertise on (a) endorser-event fit, (b) attitudes toward an event, and (c) intentions to purchase tickets to an event. Students ( N = 173) from three universities participated in an experiment to test the study’s hypotheses. Results indicate that athlete attractiveness and athlete expertise were both positively related to endorser-event fit and the effects of expertise on fit were significantly stronger than those of attractiveness. Further, attitudes toward the event partially mediated the relationship between endorser-event fit and intentions to purchase tickets to the event, whereas identification moderated the relationship. Results are discussed relative to associative learning theory and the match-up hypothesis, as well as ramifications they present for marketers and promoters of women’s sport.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1