Human Brain Mapping · 2008 · 369 citations · 31 references
Life SciencesNeurobiologyNeuroscienceComputational NeuroscienceNeurophysiologySystems NeuroscienceCortical NetworksNetwork DynamicsNeural Circuit DynamicsNeural OscillationsNeural System ModelingNeuronal DynamicsCortical DynamicsCortical Network OscillationsLesion EffectsNeural Mass ModelsNeural Network OscillationsNeuronal Network DynamicsOscillatory DynamicsOscillatory Synchrony
Understanding cortical lesions requires considering both local loss and network‑wide changes in endogenous oscillatory interactions. The study investigates how network embedding affects a region’s functional role and the consequences of its damage by implementing two oscillatory cortical interaction models based on macaque anatomical connectivity. The authors use a Kuramoto phase oscillator model to study entrainment sequences toward global synchrony and a neural mass model to evaluate long‑run directed information flow between regions. Highly connected parietal and frontal areas synchronize most rapidly due to clustered architecture, lesion effects spread beyond immediate neighbors with amplitude and dispersal shaped by cluster patterns, and lesions of parietal (areas 5, 7a) and frontal (areas 46, FEF) regions pose the greatest risk to integrative neocortical function. Published in Hum Brain Mapp, 2008; © 2008 Wiley‑Liss, Inc.
Abstract To understand the effects of a cortical lesion it is necessary to consider not only the loss of local neural function, but also the lesion‐induced changes in the larger network of endogenous oscillatory interactions in the brain. To investigate how network embedding influences a region's functional role, and the consequences of its being damaged, we implement two models of oscillatory cortical interactions, both of which inherit their coupling architecture from the available anatomical connection data for macaque cerebral cortex. In the first model, node dynamics are governed by Kuramoto phase oscillator equations, and we investigate the sequence in which areas entrain one another in the transition to global synchrony. In the second model, node dynamics are governed by a more realistic neural mass model, and we assess long‐run inter‐regional interactions using a measure of directed information flow. Highly connected parietal and frontal areas are found to synchronize most rapidly, more so than equally highly connected visual and somatosensory areas, and this difference can be explained in terms of the network's clustered architecture. For both models, lesion effects extend beyond the immediate neighbors of the lesioned site, and the amplitude and dispersal of nonlocal effects are again influenced by cluster patterns in the network. Although the consequences of in vivo lesions will always depend on circuitry local to the damaged site, we conclude that lesions of parietal regions (especially areas 5 and 7a) and frontal regions (especially areas 46 and FEF) have the greatest potential to disrupt the integrative aspects of neocortical function. Hum Brain Mapp, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
31
Measuring Information Transfer
Thomas Schreiber · Physical Review Letters · 2000 · 4.5K citations · Full text
Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals
Jean-Philippe Lachaux, Eugenio Rodríguez, Jacques Martinerie et al. · Human Brain Mapping · 1999 · 3.9K citations · Full text
Voltage oscillations in the barnacle giant muscle fiber
Catherine E. Morris, Harold Lecar · Biophysical Journal · 1981 · 2.3K citations · Full text