British Journal of Cancer · 2011 · 43 citations · 31 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyCancer PharmacologyMedical OncologyOncology PharmacotherapyDose Adjustment In OncologyDose EscalationDose SchedulingLung Cancer PharmacotherapyOncology PharmacologyToxicity ManagementDose Escalation EvaluationDose Escalation TherapyDosing Error SurveillanceErlotinib TherapyIntrapatient Dose AdaptationIntrapatient Dose EscalationNon-small Cell Lung Cancer TherapyNon-small Cell Lung Cancer Treatment
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the anticancer activity of erlotinib in patients with previously treated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose dose is increased to that associated with a maximal level of tolerable skin toxicity (i.e., target rash (TR)); to characterise the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of higher doses of erlotinib. METHODS: Patients initially received erlotinib 150 mg per day. The dose was successively increased in each patient to that associated with a TR. Anticancer activity was evaluated. Plasma, skin, and hair were sampled for PK and PD studies. RESULTS: Erlotinib dose escalation to 200-475 mg per day was feasible in 38 (90%) of 42 patients. Twenty-four (57%) patients developed a TR, but 19 (79%) did so at 150 mg per day. Five (12%) patients, all of whom developed a TR, had a partial response. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.3 months (95% CI: 1.61, 4.14); median PFS was 3.5 months and 1.9 months, respectively, for patients who did and did not experience a TR (hazard ratio, 0.51; P=0.051). Neither rash severity nor response correlated with erlotinib exposure. CONCLUSION: Intrapatient dose escalation of erlotinib does not appreciably increase the propensity to experience a maximal level of tolerable skin toxicity, or appear to increase the anticancer activity of erlotinib in NSCLC.
31
Erlotinib in Previously Treated Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
Frances A. Shepherd, José Rodrigues Pereira, Tudor–Eliade Ciuleanu et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2005 · 5.5K citations · Full text
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +15
Malcolm J. Moore, David Goldstein, John Hamm et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2007 · 3.9K citations
Medicine, Oncology, Pharmacology +17
Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials
Richard Simon · Controlled Clinical Trials · 1989 · 3.6K citations