Publication | Closed Access
EUV lithography scanner for sub-8nm resolution
61
Citations
7
References
2015
Year
EngineeringElectron-beam LithographyMicroscopyEuv Lithography ScannerOptic DesignAnamorphic SystemAnamorphic StepBeam LithographyComputational ImagingComputational PhotographyInstrumentationRadiation ImagingNanolithography MethodRadiologyHealth SciencesLight Field ImagingMedical ImagingOphthalmologyMicroelectronicsAdaptive OpticNm Half PitchBiomedical ImagingApplied PhysicsGeometrical Aberration
EUV lithography for resolutions below 8 nm half pitch requires the numerical aperture (NA) of the projection lens to be significantly larger than the current state-of-the-art 0.33NA. In order to be economically viable, a throughput in the range of 100 wafers per hour is needed. As a result of the increased NA, the incidence angles of the light rays at the mask increase significantly. Consequently the shadowing deteriorates the aerial image contrast to unacceptably low values at the current 4x magnification. The only solution to reduce the angular range at the mask is to increase the magnification. Simulations show that we have to double the magnification to 8x in order to overcome the shadowing effects. Assuming that the mask infrastructure will not change the mask form factor, this would inevitably lead to a field size that is a quarter of the field size of current 0.33NA step and scan systems. This would reduce the throughput of the high-NA scanner to a value significantly below 100 wafers per hour unless additional measures are taken. This paper presents an anamorphic step and scan system capable to print fields that are half the field size of the current full field. The anamorphic system has the potential to achieve a throughput in excess of 150 wafers per hour by increasing the transmission of the optics as well as increasing the acceleration of the wafer- and mask stage. This makes it an economically viable lithography solution. Furthermore, the simulated imaging behavior of the system is demonstrated and its impact on the rest of the lithographic system is discussed.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1