Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Culture of Disengagement in Engineering Education?

775

Citations

46

References

2013

Year

TLDR

US engineering education’s role in fostering ethical responsibility remains uncertain. The study investigates whether students’ interest in public welfare declines during engineering education and how program emphasis relates to this change. Using longitudinal survey data from four colleges, the authors tracked four public‑welfare dimensions—ethical responsibility, technology consequences, machine use, and social consciousness. Results show that program cultural emphases correlate with declining public‑welfare concerns, yet dismantling disengagement pillars could promote more engaged engineers.

Abstract

Much has been made of the importance of training ethical, socially conscious engineers, but does US engineering education actually encourage neophytes to take seriously their professional responsibility to public welfare? Counter to such ideals of engagement, I argue that students’ interest in public welfare concerns may actually decline over the course of their engineering education. Using unique longitudinal survey data of students at four colleges, this article examines (a) how students’ public welfare beliefs change during their engineering education, (b) whether engineering programs emphasize engagement, and (c) whether these program emphases are related to students’ public welfare beliefs. I track four specific public welfare considerations: the importance to students of professional/ethical responsibilities, understanding the consequences of technology, understanding how people use machines, and social consciousness. Suggesting a culture of disengagement, I find that the cultural emphases of students’ engineering programs are directly related to their public welfare commitments and students’ public welfare concerns decline significantly over the course of their engineering education. However, these findings also suggest that if engineering programs can dismantle the ideological pillars of disengagement in their local climates, they may foster more engaged engineers.

References

YearCitations

Page 1