Publication | Closed Access
Shades of green: linking environmental locus of control and pro‐environmental behaviors
395
Citations
60
References
2005
Year
Internal LocEngineeringEnvironmental Impact AssessmentExternal LocSustainable DevelopmentEnvironmental PsychologyConsumer ResearchEnvironmental PlanningGreen PolicyPsychologySocial SciencesEnvironmental BehaviorManagementPro‐environmental BehaviorsConsumer BehaviorEnvironmental ManagementGreen Decision-makingEnvironmentBehavioral SciencesCorporate Social ResponsibilityCorporate SustainabilityMarketingEnvironmental LocusSustainabilityPro-environmental Behavior
Purpose The purpose of this research was to examine the impact of various attitudes and personality characteristics on environmentally‐friendly behaviors, from a locus of control (LOC) perspective. Specifically, we developed and tested a model linking a related construct, environmental locus of control (ELOC), to a series of pro‐environmental behaviors. Design/methodology/approach The context related to various personal and household behaviors vis‐à‐vis the environment, and the subject pool consisted of a diverse group of urban consumers. A survey was employed to measure various attitudinal and personality variables corresponding to internal/external locus of control, as well as a battery of pro‐environmental behaviors. The research propositions were tested using a structural equation modeling approach. Findings We found four distinct dimensions of ELOC, two of which relate to an external LOC (“biospheric‐altruism” and “corporate skepticism”) and the other two relate to an internal LOC (“economic motivation” and “individual recycling efforts”). We then linked these four dimensions to a variety of pro‐environmental behaviors. Highly variable patterns were obtained, with different dimensions assuming a greater or lesser impact, or no role at all, depending on the specific behavior under analysis. Research limitations/implications Generalizability of the findings is limited due to the sample (urban consumers from one major city), and the method employed (validity of self‐report measures and the non‐experimental nature of the field study). Practical implications Our findings highlight the importance of considering the specificity of pro‐environmental behaviors, when assessing the antecedent roles of pro‐environmental attitudes/dispositions, which are in‐and‐of‐themselves, complex and multidimensional. Originality/value In this era of environmental degradation, researchers, managers, and public policy makers alike need to consider that pro‐environmental attitudes are composed of multiple dispositional facets, and that the role of these facets is highly context‐specific.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1