Publication | Closed Access
Growth, Yield, and Quality of Forage Maize Under Different Nitrogen Management Practices
129
Citations
0
References
1993
Year
BiogeochemistryCrop ProductionEngineeringAcid Detergent FiberSustainable AgricultureCrop ScienceCrop ProtectionAgricultural EconomicsCrop YieldN FertilizerForage MaizeForage QualityPublic HealthSoil FertilitySeed ProcessingCrop Quality
Abstract Maize ( Zea mays L.) forage producers need more information on how N management affects dry matter (DM) yield, forage quality, and residual soil NO − 3 ‐N concentrations. Studies were conducted in New York to evaluate three hybrids under different sidedress N rates (0, 56, 140, and 255 kg N ha −1 at the V4 stage) and timing (70 + 70 kg N ha −1 at V4 and V8 and 75 + 75 + 75 kg N ha −1 at V4, V8, and R1 stages). The DM yields, which averaged 25% lower in 1991 (12.3 Mg ha −1 ) compared to 1990 (16.9 Mg ha −1 ), responded curvilinearly to N rates with maximum economic yields of 140 and 160 kg N ha −1 , respectively. Whole‐plant neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and N concentrations responded linearly to N rates in 1990 indicating that forage quality improved with each additional increment of N. Higher N rates, however, increased residual soil NO − 3 ‐N concentrations in the upper 0.3 m soil depth in 1990 (0, 3, 30, and 32 mg kg −1 ) and 1991 (0, 0, 17, and 17 mg kg −1 for the 0, 56, 140, and 225 kg N treatments, respectively). Split‐N applications compared to respective single rate N applications did not increase DM yields, improve forage quality, or decrease residual soil NO − 3 ‐N concentrations. When applying higher rates of N fertilizer, maize forage producers must balance potential benefits of higher DM yields and improved forage quality with the potential risk of increased residual soil NO − 3 ‐N concentrations.