Patients, Doctors and Contracts: An Application of Principal‐Agent Theory to the Doctor‐Patient Relationship

Anthony Scott, Sandra Vick

Scottish Journal of Political Economy · 1999 · 125 citations · 1 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Principal‑agent theory has traditionally focused on the doctor‑patient relationship in health care. This study investigates how communication between doctors and patients can maximize patient utility. Patients’ preferences for attributes of the doctor‑patient relationship were measured using a discrete‑choice experiment presenting paired hypothetical GP visit scenarios. In time‑constrained consultations, the ability to talk to the doctor was the most valued attribute, followed by understanding, waiting time, and information amount; quality of information mattered more than quantity, decision‑making involvement had no overall effect but mattered for young and female patients, suggesting targeted policies and communication‑skills training to mitigate information asymmetry.

Abstract

The doctor‐patient relationship has been the main focus of principal‐agent theory in health care. This paper focuses on communication between doctors and patients within the doctor‐patient relationship as a method by which the utility of the principal (patient) can be maximised. Patients’ preferences for various attributes of the doctor‐patient relationship are examined using a discrete choice experiment. Individuals were presented with pairs of hypothetical scenarios describing GP visits that differed depending on the attributes of the doctor‐patient relationship. In the time‐constrained GP consultation, the results show that being able to talk to the doctor is the most important attribute, followed by patients’ understanding of the doctor’s explanations, waiting time for an appointment, and the amount of information transferred to the patient. Quality of information is more important than its quantity. The extent to which patients were involved in decision making had no influence on the choice of visit, although it was important to patients who were relatively young and female. Policies aimed at involving patients in decision making should be targeted at specific groups of patients only. The results have implications for the training of doctors in communication skills as a response to market failure caused by asymmetry of information.

References

1