Repeated Auctions with Budgets in Ad Exchanges: Approximations and Design

Santiago Balseiro, Omar Besbes, Gabriel Y. Weintraub

Management Science · 2015 · 180 citations · 36 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Ad exchanges are emerging Internet markets where advertisers buy display ad placements in real time based on viewer data, directly from publishers through simple auctions, and they operate with prespecified budgets across multiple second‑price auctions. The study introduces a fluid mean‑field equilibrium model to analyze the competitive landscape in ad exchanges and guide publishers’ auction‑design decisions. The authors model budget‑constrained advertisers as a fluid mean‑field equilibrium, capturing dynamic interactions across repeated second‑price auctions. The FMFE closely approximates rational advertiser behavior, enables precise auction‑design prescriptions, and shows that ignoring budgets can cause significant publisher profit losses when setting reserve prices. Accepted by Dimitris Bertsimas, optimization.

Abstract

Ad exchanges are emerging Internet markets where advertisers may purchase display ad placements, in real time and based on specific viewer information, directly from publishers via a simple auction mechanism. Advertisers join these markets with a prespecified budget and participate in multiple second-price auctions over the length of a campaign. This paper studies the competitive landscape that arises in ad exchanges and the implications for publishers’ decisions. The presence of budgets introduces dynamic interactions among advertisers that need to be taken into account when attempting to characterize the bidding landscape or the impact of changes in the auction design. To this end, we introduce the notion of a fluid mean-field equilibrium (FMFE) that is behaviorally appealing and computationally tractable, and in some important cases, it yields a closed-form characterization. We establish that an FMFE approximates well the rational behavior of advertisers in these markets. We then show how this framework may be used to provide sharp prescriptions for key auction design decisions that publishers face in these markets. In particular, we show that ignoring budgets, a common practice in this literature, can result in significant profit losses for the publisher when setting the reserve price. This paper was accepted by Dimitris Bertsimas, optimization.

References

36