Publication | Closed Access
“When I First Got It, I Wanted to Throw It Off a Cliff”: The Challenges and Benefits of Learning AAC Technologies as Described by Adults who use AAC
102
Citations
17
References
2005
Year
Learning Aac TechnologiesEffective UseSpeech SciencesDisabilityEducationCommunication SupportCerebral PalsyCommunicationTechnology IntegrationSocial Communication DisorderAdult LearningDigital HealthTechnology-based InterventionAugmentative And Alternative CommunicationAssistive TechnologyLanguage RepresentationMobile LearningLearning SciencesFunctional CommunicationArtsEquity Studies (Financial Accounting)RehabilitationTelerehabilitationEducational InnovationAugmentative And Alternative Communication AssessmentSpeechlanguage PathologyEquity Studies (Critical Cultural Studies)Augmentative CommunicationCliff ”Special EducationFocus GroupTechnologyTechnology-enhanced Active LearningDigital Learning
Seven individuals (aged 21 – 41 years) with cerebral palsy and who used speech generating augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices participated in a focus group discussion on the benefits and challenges of learning AAC technologies. The focus group was conducted on the Internet over a 9-week period. Five major themes emerged from the discussion: (a) selection of an AAC device; (b) knowledge and skills needed to use AAC technologies; (c) instruction and practice activities; (d) assessment of skill acquisition; and (e) advice to others. Participants reported that a consumer-driven assessment approach, which included the opportunity to discuss options with other individuals who used AAC, was key to the selection of an appropriate device. Participants identified a wide variety of important supports to learning how to make effective use of AAC technologies, including text and technological supports, individual exploration, learning from professionals, drill and practice, learning from peers, and opportunities for functional use in the community. For the participants, successful use of AAC technology was best assessed by functional use in the community.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1