Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 2015 · 68 citations · 26 references
PharmacyPharmacokineticsPharmacologyPharmacokinetic ModelingPopulation PharmacokineticsTherapeutic Drug MonitoringBayesian Pharmacokinetic ModelingBayesian Population PharmacokineticsModel BuildingModel EvaluationPediatric Therapeutic Drug MonitoringPopulation Pharmacokinetic ModelingBayesian Population Pharmacokinetic ModelingChild PharmacokineticsDose Adjustment In ChildrenDrug Trough ConcentrationNonparametric Population ModelingPediatric Pharmacokinetic ModelingPediatric Population PharmacokineticsTrough Concentrations
Despite the documented benefit of voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring, nonlinear pharmacokinetics make the timing of steady-state trough sampling and appropriate dose adjustments unpredictable by conventional methods. We developed a nonparametric population model with data from 141 previously richly sampled children and adults. We then used it in our multiple-model Bayesian adaptive control algorithm to predict measured concentrations and doses in a separate cohort of 33 pediatric patients aged 8 months to 17 years who were receiving voriconazole and enrolled in a pharmacokinetic study. Using all available samples to estimate the individual Bayesian posterior parameter values, the median percent prediction bias relative to a measured target trough concentration in the patients was 1.1% (interquartile range, -17.1 to 10%). Compared to the actual dose that resulted in the target concentration, the percent bias of the predicted dose was -0.7% (interquartile range, -7 to 20%). Using only trough concentrations to generate the Bayesian posterior parameter values, the target bias was 6.4% (interquartile range, -1.4 to 14.7%; P = 0.16 versus the full posterior parameter value) and the dose bias was -6.7% (interquartile range, -18.7 to 2.4%; P = 0.15). Use of a sample collected at an optimal time of 4 h after a dose, in addition to the trough concentration, resulted in a nonsignificantly improved target bias of 3.8% (interquartile range, -13.1 to 18%; P = 0.32) and a dose bias of -3.5% (interquartile range, -18 to 14%; P = 0.33). With the nonparametric population model and trough concentrations, our control algorithm can accurately manage voriconazole therapy in children independently of steady-state conditions, and it is generalizable to any drug with a nonparametric pharmacokinetic model. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01976078.).
26
Michael Neely, Michael G. van Guilder, Walter M. Yamada et al. · Therapeutic Drug Monitoring · 2012 · 474 citations · Full text
Emmanuelle Comets, Karl Brendel, France Mentré · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · 2008 · 439 citations · Full text
Voriconazole Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Jeannina A. Smith, Nasia Safdar, V. Knasinski et al. · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 2006 · 400 citations · Full text