Perceived Institutional Ambiguity and the Choice of Organizational Form in Social Entrepreneurial Ventures

David M. Townsend, Timothy A. Hart

Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · 2008 · 248 citations · 51 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Social entrepreneurship is increasingly used to address social needs, yet founders organize under both for‑profit and nonprofit forms for essentially the same activities. The study investigates why SE founders choose different organizational forms by exploring whether motivational differences or perceived institutional ambiguity explain the inconsistency. The authors examine two explanations—motivational goal differences and perceived ambiguity in institutional trends—to understand the variation in organizational form choice. They conclude that perceptions of an ambiguous institutional environment drive the variance in organizational form choice for SE ventures, and outline theoretical and practical directions for future research.

Abstract

Social entrepreneurship (SE) is emerging as a common approach to meeting social needs. However, SE founders appear to be organizing under both for–profit and nonprofit organizational forms to engage in essentially the same activities. We investigate this lack of consistency regarding the choice of organizational form by examining two possible explanations: a difference in motivational goals among social entrepreneurs or perceived ambiguity regarding trends in core dimensions of the institutional environment. Overall, we argue that founder perceptions of an ambiguous institutional environment are leading to the variance in choice of organizational form for SE ventures. Both theoretical and practical directions for future research are discussed as well.

References

51