PLoS ONE · 2014 · 15 citations · 54 references
Natural SciencesBiophysicsCell BiologyBiomechanicsCell AdhesionMechanobiologyAdhesion DynamicsCellular BiomechanicsCellular MechanicsExtracellular MatrixExtracellular Matrix MechanicsMechanotransductionAdhesionsCell Adhesion DynamicsCell StiffnessCell-matrix MechanicsCell-substrate Stiffness SensingForce Transmission Through The MatrixStiffnessSubstrate Adhesion
Physical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM) are known to regulate cellular processes ranging from spreading to differentiation, with alterations in cell phenotype closely associated with changes in physical properties of cells themselves. When plated on substrates of varying stiffness, fibroblasts have been shown to exhibit stiffness matching property, wherein cell cortical stiffness increases in proportion to substrate stiffness up to 5 kPa, and subsequently saturates. Similar mechanoadaptation responses have also been observed in other cell types. Trypsin de-adhesion represents a simple experimental framework for probing the contractile mechanics of adherent cells, with de-adhesion timescales shown to scale inversely with cortical stiffness values. In this study, we combine experiments and computation in deciphering the influence of substrate properties in regulating de-adhesion dynamics of adherent cells. We first show that NIH 3T3 fibroblasts cultured on collagen-coated polyacrylamide hydrogels de-adhere faster on stiffer substrates. Using a simple computational model, we qualitatively show how substrate stiffness and cell-substrate bond breakage rate collectively influence de-adhesion timescales, and also obtain analytical expressions of de-adhesion timescales in certain regimes of the parameter space. Finally, by comparing stiffness-dependent experimental and computational de-adhesion responses, we show that faster de-adhesion on stiffer substrates arises due to force-dependent breakage of cell-matrix adhesions. In addition to illustrating the utility of employing trypsin de-adhesion as a biophysical tool for probing mechanoadaptation, our computational results highlight the collective interplay of substrate properties and bond breakage rate in setting de-adhesion timescales.
54
Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification
Adam J. Engler, Shamik Sen, H. Lee Sweeney et al. · Cell · 2006 · 13.7K citations · Full text
Matrix Crosslinking Forces Tumor Progression by Enhancing Integrin Signaling
Kandice R. Levental, Hongmei Yu, Laura Kass et al. · Cell · 2009 · 4K citations · Full text
Cell Movement Is Guided by the Rigidity of the Substrate
Chun‐Min Lo, Hong-Bei Wang, Micah Dembo et al. · Biophysical Journal · 2000 · 3.3K citations · Full text
Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bonds
E. Evans, Ken Ritchie · Biophysical Journal · 1997 · 2.5K citations · Full text
Natural Sciences, Materials Engineering, Materials Science +12