TRIADS IN SUPPLY NETWORKS: THEORIZING BUYER–SUPPLIER–SUPPLIER RELATIONSHIPS

Thomas Y. Choi, Zhaohui Wu

Journal of Supply Chain Management · 2008 · 433 citations · 138 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Supply‑chain research has traditionally examined dyadic buyer–supplier links, yet dyads fail to capture the full network structure. This paper argues that triads are the fundamental building blocks of supply networks and initiates analysis of their internal dynamics. The authors integrate buyer–supplier and supplier–supplier literature and employ balance theory and the structural‑hole concept to generate theoretical propositions. They identify nine buyer–supplier–supplier triadic archetypes and propose key propositions to guide decision making in supply networks.

Abstract

Past studies in supply chain management have focused on dyadic relationships (e.g., buyer–supplier), as all relationships in a network begin with a dyad. However, dyads do not capture the essence of a network. We posit in this paper that triads are the fundamental building blocks of a network. To begin considering triads in supply networks, we build on two extant bodies of literature — the buyer–supplier relationship and supplier–supplier relationship literature which offer us the context of buyer–supplier–supplier triads. By doing so, we are taking the first step toward cracking the internal dynamics of triads in supply networks. To build theoretical propositions, we apply balance theory and the structural‐hole concept. We identify nine triadic archetypes of buyer–supplier–supplier relationships and state key propositions that aid in decision making in supply networks.

References

138