Journal of Business Communication · 2007 · 39 citations · 18 references
Total Quality ManagementCustomer SatisfactionManagement Communication AcademicsBusiness-to-business ResearchBusiness IntelligenceIntegrated ReportingInformation QualityJournalismImpact FactorJournal QualityManagementBusiness CommunicationCommunication StrategyMember SurveyCorporate Social ResponsibilityAbc MembersOrganizational CommunicationQuality JudgmentsBusinessArts
This commentary describes and critiques criteria that, according to results from an Association for Business Communication (ABC) member survey, are having an impact on quality judgments about our journals. ABC members rank the Journal of Business Communication and Business Communication Quarterly as top research and pedagogical journals in business/management communication, a finding corroborated by a larger study of academics in business and technical communication. However, the growing importance of citation counts and journal rankings currently disadvantages our journals, presenting us with professional obligations and personal dilemmas in relation to them. The authors' purpose is to raise awareness of the various determinants of perceptions of journal quality, to explore the communal views of ABC members on this issue, and to seek ways of enhancing the value of business/management communication research in the academic marketplace.
18
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
Per O. Seglen · BMJ · 1997 · 2.5K citations
Reliability, Altmetrics, Engineering +13