The meaning of role modelling in moral and character education

Wouter Sanderse

Journal of Moral Education · 2012 · 249 citations · 38 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Character education treats teachers as role models, yet the practical meaning of this role remains unclear. The study asks whether teachers model admirable character traits and do so effectively, reviewing pedagogical and psychological literature to answer these questions. The authors review relevant literature, assess the use of role modelling as a secondary‑school teaching method, identify adolescents’ role models and their moral qualities, and examine moral learners’ psychology through Bandura’s social‑learning theory. Role modelling is rarely used explicitly, and only a small fraction of adolescents recognize teachers as role models; to enhance moral education, teachers should explain the moral significance of modeled traits and guide students in acquiring them.

Abstract

Character education considers teachers to be role models, but it is unclear what this means in practice. Do teachers model admirable character traits? And do they do so effectively? In this article the relevant pedagogical and psychological literature is reviewed in order to shed light on these questions. First, the use of role modelling as a teaching method in secondary education is assessed. Second, adolescents' role models and their moral qualities are identified. Third, the psychology of moral learners is critically examined, using Bandura's social learning theory as point of departure. It turns out that role modelling is rarely used as an explicit teaching method and that only a very small percentage of adolescents recognises teachers as role models. If role modelling is to contribute to children's moral education, teachers are recommended to explain why the modelled traits are morally significant and how students can acquire these qualities for themselves.

References

38