Journal of Applied Physics · 1987 · 29 citations · 11 references
EngineeringElectrical EngineeringMaterials ScienceOptoelectronicsSemiconductor DevicesSemiconductor MaterialsDopingPhotovoltaic DevicesPhotovoltaic MaterialsSemiconductor Device MaterialsSemiconductor PhysicsSolar CellsConcentrator PhotovoltaicsContact GeometryDoped SemiconductorsDoping Effects On Device PerformanceOptical AbsorptionSolar Cell CharacterizationSolar Cell Device PhysicsSolar Cell Fabrication
We have processed a diffused Ge wafer into a Ge concentrator solar cell and mechanically stacked it under a GaAs cell fabricated by Varian. We measured this stack’s efficiency to be 26.1% for terrestrial air mass 1.5 direct (AM1.5D) conditions at a 285× concentration ratio. We showed that this efficiency is limited by optical absorption in the Varian GaAs cell caused by high 2–4 (1018) cm−3 substrate doping. We used a 2×1017 cm−3 doped GaAs filter to estimate the stack efficiency as 27.4%, which would be achieved with the same Varian GaAs cell formed on a lower doped substrate. We project efficiencies assuming the best properties reported for a GaAs device. This gives a 29.6% efficiency for an improved, planar Ge cell and 31.6% efficiency for a proposed point contact geometry for the Ge cell. The corresponding space (AM0) efficiencies at a 159× concentration ratio range from the 23.4% value we measured on the stack up to 28.4% projected for the point contact Ge place under the best GaAs cell. We showed that Ge cells give higher efficiencies than Si when stacked under GaAs.
11
W. G. Spitzer, J. M. Whelan · Physical Review · 1959 · 422 citations
Natural Sciences, Materials Engineering, Materials Science +15
27.5-percent silicon concentrator solar cells
Ronald A. Sinton, Young Kwark, J.Y. Gan et al. · IEEE Electron Device Letters · 1986 · 200 citations
Extraterrestrial Solar Spectrum, 3000–6100 Å at 1-Å Intervals
Matthew P. Thekaekara · Applied Optics · 1974 · 195 citations