Concepedia

Publication | Open Access

Genome-Scale CRISPR-Cas9 Knockout Screening in Human Cells

5.4K

Citations

24

References

2013

Year

TLDR

The simplicity of programming the CRISPR‑Cas9 nuclease to modify specific genomic loci suggests a new way to interrogate gene function on a genome‑wide scale. The authors used lentiviral delivery of a genome‑scale CRISPR‑Cas9 knockout library targeting 18,080 genes with 64,751 guides to perform both negative and positive selection screens in human cells, including a melanoma model to identify genes whose loss confers resistance to the RAF inhibitor vemurafenib. Using the GeCKO library, the authors identified essential genes for cell viability in cancer and pluripotent stem cells, found that loss of NF1, MED12, NF2, CUL3, TADA2B, and TADA1 confers resistance to vemurafenib in melanoma, and reported high consistency and hit confirmation rates, underscoring the promise of genome‑scale CRISPR‑Cas9 screening.

Abstract

The simplicity of programming the CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats)-associated nuclease Cas9 to modify specific genomic loci suggests a new way to interrogate gene function on a genome-wide scale. We show that lentiviral delivery of a genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 knockout (GeCKO) library targeting 18,080 genes with 64,751 unique guide sequences enables both negative and positive selection screening in human cells. First, we used the GeCKO library to identify genes essential for cell viability in cancer and pluripotent stem cells. Next, in a melanoma model, we screened for genes whose loss is involved in resistance to vemurafenib, a therapeutic RAF inhibitor. Our highest-ranking candidates include previously validated genes NF1 and MED12, as well as novel hits NF2, CUL3, TADA2B, and TADA1. We observe a high level of consistency between independent guide RNAs targeting the same gene and a high rate of hit confirmation, demonstrating the promise of genome-scale screening with Cas9.

References

YearCitations

2005

54.5K

2012

16.7K

2013

15.4K

2002

10.6K

2013

9.2K

2013

4.8K

2013

3.7K

2010

3.5K

2013

3.3K

2013

1.8K

Page 1