Publication | Closed Access
Differences in Student Information and Communication Technology Literacy Based on Socio-Economic Status, Ethnicity, and Gender
190
Citations
19
References
2013
Year
Information EducationEducationLiteracy DevelopmentCommunicationDigital DivideLiteracy EvaluationTechnology IntegrationSocio-economic StatusEducational Data LiteracyAdult LiteracyLiteracy PracticeInformation LiteracyArtsLiteracy LearningSchool DistrictsLiteracy MediaDigital Media LiteracyDigital LiteracyStudent InformationCommunication Technology LiteracyCommunication TechnologyLiteracyDigital InequalityTechnology
This study examines how middle‑school students’ ICT literacy relates to socioeconomic status, gender, and ethnicity, and discusses implications for practice and future research. The study surveyed 5,990 middle‑school students from 13 Florida districts who completed the Student Tool for Technology Literacy, a performance‑based assessment aligned with the 2008 National Educational Technology Standards. Results reveal a digital divide, with high‑SES, white, and female students outperforming their low‑SES, non‑white, and male peers on all ICT literacy measures.
This research examines student information and communication technology (ICT) literacy and its relationships to a student’s socio-economic status (SES), gender, and ethnicity of middle school students. We recruited 5,990 students from 13 school districts across the state of Florida. Student participants completed the Student Tool for Technology Literacy (ST2L), a performance-based assessment of ICT literacy skills based on the 2008 National Educational Technology Standards for Students (NETS.S). Results show a digital divide between low and high SES, white and non-white, and female and male students on all measures of the ST2L. Specifically, high-SES, white, and female students outperformed their counterparts. The results provide compelling evidence of a digital divide within Florida schools. The article discusses the implications of the findings for practice and future research.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1