Special Education's Changing Identity: Paradoxes and Dilemmas in Views of Culture and Space

Alfredo J. Artiles

Harvard Educational Review · 2003 · 286 citations · 61 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Special education research and practice are grappling with paradoxes and dilemmas as they strive to build socially just education systems amid a democratic society marked by increasing complexity of difference. The article aims to identify and analyze the paradoxes and dilemmas confronting special education researchers and practitioners in their pursuit of socially just education. The author situates his analysis within the political debates on educational reform, reviews literature on inclusion and overrepresentation, and offers a multilayered examination of culture and space that highlights research limitations and proposes new directions. He concludes that inclusion and overrepresentation must engage in fuller dialogue, recognize troubling silences, and surface assumptions about difference, culture, and space to prevent perpetuating silences that threaten historically marginalized students, while also outlining limitations and new possibilities for the field.

Abstract

In this article, Alfredo Artiles identifies "paradoxes and dilemmas" faced by special education researchers and practitioners who are seeking to create socially just education systems in a democratic society that is currently marked by an increasing complexity of difference. He argues that the two primary discourse communities — inclusion and overrepresentation — must engage in a fuller dialogue and recognize the "troubling silences" within and between their respective literatures. Placing his analysis within the larger political context of current efforts and debates over educational reform, the author gives readers a broad overview of the literature on inclusion and overrepresentation. He then presents a multilayered analysis of culture and space that identifies the limitations of current research, while offering new possibilities and directions for the field. Artiles concludes that unless researchers and practitioners surface their assumptions about difference, as well as culture and space, the special education field will continue to perpetuate the silences that threaten the educational and life needs of historically marginalized students.

References

61