The Interacting Effects of Accountability and Individual Differences on Rater Response to a Performance‐Rating Task

Abstract

We examine the effects of conscientiousness and public self‐consciousness in moderating responses to accountability for 137 participants took part in a managerial simulation over a 2‐week period. In addition to responding to complex information and decision tasks, participants observed 48 vignettes depicting individual performance for four subordinates on three performance dimensions and subsequently rated that performance. Results show that participants higher in conscientiousness and public self‐consciousness perceived a greater need to justify their decisions than those lower in the trait. Public self‐consciousness also moderated the relationship between perceived need to justify the rating and participant anxiety about that justification requirement. Subsequent tests of mediation using structural equation modeling found support for partial mediating models and overall model fit improved when personality was considered.