Stopping Rule Evaluation
Stopping Rule Evaluation is a methodological framework within cumulative meta-analysis that determines the optimal point at which sequential accumulation of evidence reaches sufficient statistical or clinical precision to warrant cessation of further research.
130
Publications
8.2K
Citations
431
Authors
252
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
16
Parents
130
1–5 of 130
431
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, United Kingdom
4 publications · 435 citations
4
h-index
3
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1–5 of 431
252
Harvard University
Cambridge, United States
5 h-index
8 publications
443 citations

University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, United States
5 h-index
6 publications
389 citations
Columbia University
New York, United States
4 h-index
4 publications
287 citations
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, United States
4 h-index
5 publications
1K citations
National Cancer Institute
Bethesda, United States
4 h-index
6 publications
395 citations
University of Oxford
Oxford, United Kingdom
4 h-index
4 publications
82 citations
MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL
London, United Kingdom
4 h-index
10 publications
302 citations

Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, France
3 h-index
3 publications
139 citations
1–8 of 252
16 publications · 671 citations
15
h-index
6 publications · 712 citations
6
h-index
5 publications · 222 citations
5
h-index
4 publications · 228 citations
4
h-index
4 publications · 1K citations
4
h-index
1–5