Reviewer Comments
Reviewer Comments is a scholarly evaluation artifact comprising critical feedback, suggestions, and assessments provided by domain experts on a research proposal, distinguishing it from other forms of academic input through its formal, peer-based, and revision-directed nature.
176
Publications
10K
Citations
481
Authors
285
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
61
Variants
Peer Review CommentsReferee Comments
Parents
176
ESHRE Guideline: management of women with premature ovarian insufficiency
Lisa Webber, Melanie Davies, Richard A. Anderson et al. · Human Reproduction · 2016 · 1.6K citations · Full text
Medicine, Endocrinology, Gynecology +16
Peer reviewers learn from giving comments
Young Hoan Cho, Kwangsu Cho · Instructional Science · 2010 · 292 citations
Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts
Georges Bordage · Academic Medicine · 2001 · 231 citations
1–5 of 176
481
3
h-index
3
h-index
3
h-index
3
h-index
2
h-index
1–5 of 481
285
University of Zurich
Zurich, Switzerland
6 h-index
7 publications
400 citations
University College London
London, United Kingdom
5 h-index
11 publications
7.9K citations
University of Illinois Chicago
Chicago, United States
4 h-index
5 publications
411 citations
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, United States
3 h-index
6 publications
182 citations
Michigan Medicine
Ann Arbor, United States
3 h-index
6 publications
180 citations
Stanford University
Stanford, United States
3 h-index
4 publications
101 citations
ETH Zurich
Zurich, Switzerland
3 h-index
6 publications
226 citations

University of Massachusetts Amherst
Amherst Center, United States
3 h-index
4 publications
194 citations
1–8 of 285
14 publications · 522 citations
12
h-index
5 publications · 191 citations
5
h-index
TSE · 3 publications · 252 citations
3
h-index
3 publications · 92 citations
3
h-index
2 publications · 69 citations
2
h-index
1–5