Concepedia

Pairwise Comparison Elicitation

Pairwise Comparison Elicitation is a methodological framework within expert judgment elicitation that systematically derives subjective probabilities or preferences by requiring experts to iteratively compare pairs of alternatives or hypotheses to assess their relative likelihood, importance, or plausibility.

71

Publications

2.8K

Citations

177

Authors

105

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

27

Parents

Publications

71

Estimating the Weights for Multiple Attributes in a Composite Criterion Using Pairwise Judgments

V. Srinivasan, Allan D. Shocker · Psychometrika · 1973 · 240 citations

, , +14

Inconsistent and contradictory judgements in pairwise comparison method in the AHP

Mirosław Kwiesielewicz, Ewa van Uden · Computers & Operations Research · 2003 · 174 citations

, , +10

Base-criterion on multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications

Gholamreza Haseli, Reza Sheikh, Shib Sankar Sana · International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management · 2019 · 108 citations

, , +12

Interval Evaluations in the Analytic Hierarchy Process By Possibility Analysis

Kazutomi Sugihara, Hideo Tanaka · Computational Intelligence · 2001 · 102 citations

, , +11

Selecting the Individual Numerical Scale and Prioritization Method in the Analytic Hierarchy Process: A 2-Tuple Fuzzy Linguistic Approach

Yucheng Dong, Wei‐Chiang Hong, Yinfeng Xu et al. · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · 2010 · 100 citations

, , +14

1–5 of 71

Authors

177

  1. MK
    Miłosz Kadziński

    Poznań University of Technology, Poland

    3 publications · 107 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. YW
    Yu-Cheng Wang

    Chaoyang University of Technology, Taiwan

    2 publications · 65 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. GK
    Gang Kou

    Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, China

    2 publications · 61 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. TT
    Tommi Tervonen

    Erasmus University Rotterdam, Netherlands

    2 publications · 86 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. AS
    Antonie Stam

    University of Georgia, United States

    2 publications · 26 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 177

Institutions

105

  1. Poznań University of Technology

    Poznan, Poland

    3 h-index

    6 publications

    214 citations

  2. University of Pittsburgh

    Pittsburgh, United States

    3 h-index

    4 publications

    425 citations

  3. Southwestern University of Finance and Economics

    Chengdu, China

    2 h-index

    2 publications

    61 citations

  4. National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University

    Hsinchu, Taiwan

    2 h-index

    2 publications

    65 citations

  5. EVRAZ (United Kingdom)

    London, United Kingdom

    2 h-index

    2 publications

    86 citations

  6. Hungarian Academy of Sciences

    Budapest, Hungary

    2 h-index

    2 publications

    84 citations

  7. University of Portsmouth

    Portsmouth, United Kingdom

    2 h-index

    2 publications

    126 citations

  8. Institute for Information Recording

    Kyiv, Ukraine

    2 h-index

    5 publications

    95 citations

1–8 of 105

Venues

  1. Decision Sciences

    4 publications · 153 citations

    4

    h-index

  2. 3

    h-index

  3. European Journal of Operational Research

    3 publications · 150 citations

    3

    h-index

  4. ISAHP proceedings

    2 publications · 108 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. 2

    h-index

1–5