Kane Validity Framework

The Kane Validity Framework is a comprehensive validity theory within educational and psychological measurement that specifies a structured argument-based approach to validation by organizing evidence around four inferences—testing, scoring, generalization, extrapolation, and utility—to justify the interpretations and uses of test scores.

35

Publications

2.6K

Citations

104

Authors

83

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

18

Variants

Argument-based Validity FrameworkKane's Validity Framework

Authors

104

  1. DA
    David A. Cook

    Mayo Clinic, United States

    3 publications · 1.1K citations

    3

    h-index

  2. RH
    Rose Hatala

    University of British Columbia, Canada

    3 publications · 1.1K citations

    3

    h-index

  3. SG
    Shiphra Ginsburg

    University of Toronto, Canada

    2 publications · 742 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. RS
    Ruti Sella

    Rabin Medical Center, Israel

    2 publications · 35 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. DJ
    Daniel J. Schumacher

    Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, United States

    2 publications · 58 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 104

Venues

  1. Journal of Educational Measurement

    4 publications · 217 citations

    4

    h-index

  2. Medical Teacher

    3 publications · 164 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. Medical Education

    2 publications · 754 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Academic Medicine

    2 publications · 175 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Perceptual and Motor Skills

    1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5