Incremental Change Justification

Incremental Change Justification is an academic concept referring to a formal rationale that belongs to the genus of scholarly contribution justifications and is differentiated by its focus on defending the significance and novelty of a minor, stepwise advancement in research methods, models, frameworks, theories, constructs, datasets, tasks, or metrics relative to existing work.

59

Publications

4K

Citations

99

Authors

62

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

10

Authors

99

  1. CA
    Chris Argyris

    Harvard University, United States

    2 publications · 78 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. ML
    Mariannunziata Liguori

    Queen's University Belfast, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 33 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. BR
    Bo Rothstein

    University of Gothenburg, Sweden

    2 publications · 392 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. NH
    Noel Hyndman

    Queen's University Belfast, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 33 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. JM
    Jeffrey M. Chwieroth

    London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 107 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 99

Venues

  1. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 4 publications · 166 citations

    4

    h-index

  2. Parliamentary Affairs

    2 publications · 33 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. Choice Reviews Online

    CRO · 2 publications · 103 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Policy and Society

    2 publications · 93 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Ethics

    1 publications · 87 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5