Incremental Change Justification
Incremental Change Justification is an academic concept referring to a formal rationale that belongs to the genus of scholarly contribution justifications and is differentiated by its focus on defending the significance and novelty of a minor, stepwise advancement in research methods, models, frameworks, theories, constructs, datasets, tasks, or metrics relative to existing work.
59
Publications
4K
Citations
99
Authors
62
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
10
59
Strategic Change: "Logical Incrementalism.".
James Brian Quinn · Sloan management review · 1978 · 657 citations
Matthew Cashmore, Richard Gwilliam, Richard Morgan et al. · Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal · 2004 · 329 citations · Full text
Public Affairs, Environmental Management, Environmental Policy +10
Professional Development in Education: In Search of the Optimal Mix.
Thomas R. Guskey · 1994 · 293 citations
1–5 of 59
99
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
London School of Economics and Political Science, United Kingdom
1 publications · 107 citations
1
h-index
1–5 of 99
62
University of Chicago
Chicago, United States
3 h-index
3 publications
155 citations
Chicago Kent College of Law
Chicago, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
92 citations
Queen's University Belfast
Belfast, United Kingdom
2 h-index
4 publications
66 citations

Harvard University Press
Cambridge, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
78 citations

University of Strathclyde
Glasgow, United Kingdom
2 h-index
2 publications
46 citations

University of Gothenburg
Gothenburg, Sweden
2 h-index
2 publications
392 citations

Carleton University
Ottawa, Canada
2 h-index
2 publications
100 citations
Seattle University
Seattle, United States
1 h-index
1 publications
14 citations
1–8 of 62
Repository · 4 publications · 166 citations
4
h-index
2 publications · 33 citations
2
h-index
CRO · 2 publications · 103 citations
2
h-index
2 publications · 93 citations
2
h-index
1 publications · 87 citations
1
h-index
1–5