Human Scoring Comparison

Human Scoring Comparison is a scholarly evaluation method within the domain of holistic scoring that systematically aligns automated or rubric-based assessments with human judgment to determine the degree of concordance in scoring outcomes.

55

Publications

3.3K

Citations

165

Authors

77

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

18

Authors

165

  1. DM
    David M. Williamson

    University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

    4 publications · 501 citations

    4

    h-index

  2. DE
    Donald E. Powers

    Educational Testing Service, United States

    3 publications · 105 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. SG
    Shang Gao

    Deakin University, Australia

    2 publications · 387 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. DK
    Daniel Katz

    Chicago Kent College of Law, United States

    2 publications · 387 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. JB
    Jill Burstein

    Educational Testing Service, United States

    2 publications · 75 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 165

Venues

  1. ETS Research Report Series

    6 publications · 192 citations

    6

    h-index

  2. Applied Measurement in Education

    3 publications · 192 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. Journal of Educational Computing Research

    3 publications · 88 citations

    3

    h-index

  4. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice

    EM · 2 publications · 500 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Open Access Journals at BC (Boston College)

    Repository · 2 publications · 138 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5