Evaluation Transparency

Evaluation Transparency is a scholarly contribution in the form of a method, model, framework, theory, construct, dataset, task, or metric that belongs to the category of evaluation practices and is distinguished by its explicit disclosure of criteria, procedures, and evidence underlying the assessment of ideas, ensuring replicability, credibility, and interpretability of evaluative outcomes.

42

Publications

1.9K

Citations

80

Authors

50

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

11

Authors

80

  1. RP
    Robert Picciotto

    King's College London, United Kingdom

    2 publications · 52 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. TA
    Tarek Azzam

    Claremont Graduate University, United States

    2 publications · 33 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. DS
    D Stufflebeam

    Western Michigan University, United States

    1 publications · 152 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. LK
    Lawrence King

    University of Massachusetts Amherst, United States

    1 publications · 11 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. JC
    John C. Ehlert

    Linguistic Society of America, United States

    1 publications · 21 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 80

Venues

  1. Evaluation and Program Planning

    5 publications · 184 citations

    5

    h-index

  2. Evaluation

    3 publications · 146 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. New Directions for Evaluation

    3 publications · 47 citations

    3

    h-index

  4. Educational Researcher

    ER · 2 publications · 29 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience

    2 publications · 100 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5