Ebel Method Comparisons

Ebel Method Comparisons is a psychometric evaluation approach that systematically contrasts the Ebel standard-setting method with alternative methods, particularly the Angoff method, to assess differences in cut score derivation, rater judgment consistency, and classification accuracy within educational and certification testing contexts.

6

Publications

117

Citations

17

Authors

18

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

1

Authors

17

  1. CM
    Colin Melville

    University of Manchester, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 34 citations

    1

    h-index

  2. SW
    Scott Wirth

    University of Illinois Chicago, United States

    1 publications · 21 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. DK
    David Kluth

    University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 34 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. MH
    Matt Homer

    University of Leeds, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 17 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. VW
    Val Wass

    Keele University, United Kingdom

    1 publications · 34 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 17

Venues

  1. Educational and Psychological Measurement

    2 publications · 24 citations

    2

    h-index

  2. Medical Teacher

    1 publications · 17 citations

    1

    h-index

  3. Evaluation & the Health Professions

    1 publications · 21 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. Teaching and Learning in Medicine

    1 publications · 21 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Medical Education

    1 publications · 34 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5