Consent Documentation Quality

Consent Documentation Quality is a measurement construct that evaluates the completeness, accuracy, and adherence to legal and ethical standards of surgical consent documents, distinguishing it from other clinical documentation assessments by its specific focus on the informational and procedural integrity of patient consent in surgical contexts.

87

Publications

3.3K

Citations

359

Authors

212

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

24

Authors

359

  1. ES
    Erica S. Spatz

    Yale University, United States

    3 publications · 58 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. ES
    Edward St John

    Imperial College London, United Kingdom

    3 publications · 101 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. SM
    Susannah M. Bernheim

    Yale University, United States

    3 publications · 58 citations

    3

    h-index

  4. HM
    Harlan M. Krumholz

    Yale University, United States

    3 publications · 58 citations

    3

    h-index

  5. ZL
    Zhenqiu Lin

    Yale University, United States

    2 publications · 41 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 359

Venues

  1. 6

    h-index

  2. Clinical Trials

    3 publications · 67 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. PubMed

    Repository · 3 publications · 65 citations

    3

    h-index

  4. Patient Education and Counseling

    3 publications · 62 citations

    3

    h-index

  5. PLoS ONE

    3 publications · 87 citations

    3

    h-index

1–5