Comparative Standards Of Proof

Comparative Standards of Proof is a methodological framework within the academic study of evidentiary standards that systematically evaluates and contrasts the relative rigor, thresholds, and justificatory requirements of different standards of proof across legal, philosophical, or epistemic contexts.

18

Publications

1.2K

Citations

20

Authors

20

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

2

Authors

20

  1. KM
    Kevin M. Clermont

    Cornell University, United States

    3 publications · 402 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. DK
    Dorothy K. Kagehiro

    Temple University, United States

    2 publications · 152 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. ES
    Emily Sherwin

    Cornell University, United States

    2 publications · 278 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. JL
    John Leubsdorf

    Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, United States

    1 publications · 27 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. YB
    Yves Botteman

    1 publications · 28 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5 of 20

Venues

  1. SSRN Electronic Journal

    Repository · 3 publications · 200 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. The American Journal of Comparative Law

    2 publications · 186 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. The International Journal of Evidence & Proof

    1 publications · 16 citations

    1

    h-index

  4. 1

    h-index

  5. Harvard journal of law & technology

    1 publications · 14 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5