Abstract Screening Data Extraction
Abstract Screening Data Extraction is a systematic process in scholarly research synthesis that involves identifying and extracting relevant paper-level contributions—such as methods, models, frameworks, theories, constructs, datasets, tasks, or metrics—from academic abstracts through predefined eligibility criteria, distinguishing it from full-text screening by focusing exclusively on summary-level information to assess study relevance at an early stage of evidence selection.
40
Publications
3.3K
Citations
208
Authors
140
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
37
Parents
40
Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality
Kusala Pussegoda, Lucy Turner, Chantelle Garritty et al. · Systematic Reviews · 2017 · 319 citations · Full text
Error rates of human reviewers during abstract screening in systematic reviews
Zhen Wang, Tarek Nayfeh, Jennifer Tetzlaff et al. · PLoS ONE · 2020 · 220 citations · Full text
Public Health, Biostatistics, Criterion-referenced Assessment +16
1–5 of 40
208
3
h-index
3
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1–5 of 208
140

University of Alberta
Edmonton, Canada
4 h-index
20 publications
1.8K citations
University of Copenhagen
Copenhagen, Denmark
3 h-index
5 publications
699 citations

University of Toronto
Toronto, Canada
3 h-index
4 publications
347 citations

University of Ottawa
Ottawa, Canada
3 h-index
9 publications
1K citations

University of Oslo
Oslo, Norway
2 h-index
4 publications
144 citations
Centre de Recherche Épidémiologie et Statistique
Paris, France
2 h-index
6 publications
574 citations
Sorbonne Paris Cité
Paris, France
2 h-index
6 publications
574 citations
MRC Epidemiology Unit
Cambridge, United Kingdom
2 h-index
2 publications
471 citations
1–8 of 140
9 publications · 949 citations
9
h-index
2 publications · 501 citations
3
h-index
2 publications · 536 citations
2
h-index
1 publications · 16 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 51 citations
1
h-index
1–5