PubMed · 2010 · 58 citations · 27 references
Public AffairsHealth AdministrationHealth Services AdministrationHealth Services ResearchHealthcare Quality ImprovementManaged CareDiabetes MellitusHealth Care OutcomesHealth Care Performance MeasurementHealth Care QualityHealthcare Performance MeasurementQuality Of CareDiabetes Care Quality ImprovementHospitalization ReductionPay For Performance EvaluationPay-for-performance MeasurementPay-for-performance PlansPhysician Performance MeasurementPhysician Quality Of CarePreferred Provider Organization Plans
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effectiveness of a pay-for-performance program (P4P) to increase the receipt of quality care and to decrease hospitalization rates among patients with diabetes mellitus. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal study of patients with diabetes enrolled in a preferred provider organization (PPO) between January 1, 1999, and December 31, 2006. METHODS: We used multivariate analyses to assess the effect of seeing P4P-participating physicians on the receipt of quality care (ie, glycosylated hemoglobin and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol testing) and on hospitalization rates, controlling for patient characteristics. RESULTS: Patients with diabetes who saw P4P-participating physicians were more likely to receive quality care than those who did not (odds ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.22; P <.001). Patients with diabetes who received quality care were less likely to be hospitalized than those who did not (incident rate ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.85; P <.001). During 1 year, there was no difference in hospitalization rates between patients with diabetes who saw P4P-participating physicians versus those who did not. However, patients with diabetes who saw P4P-participating physicians in 3 consecutive years were less likely to be hospitalized than those who did not (incident rate ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.93; P <.01). CONCLUSIONS: A P4P can significantly increase the receipt of quality care and decrease hospitalization rates among patients with diabetes in a PPO setting. Although it is possible that the differences observed between P4P-participating physicians and non-P4P-participating physicians were due to selection bias, we found no significant difference in the receipt of quality care between patients with diabetes who saw new P4P-participating physicians versus non-P4P-participating physicians during the baseline year. Further research should focus on defining the effect of P4Ps on intermediate outcomes such as glycosylated hemoglobin and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.
27
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
BMJ · 2001 · 10.8K citations
Comorbidity Measures for Use with Administrative Data
Anne Elixhauser, Claudia Steiner, D.R. Harris et al. · Medical Care · 1998 · 9.9K citations
Education, Health Services Administration, Health Assessment +16
Helen M. Colhoun, D. J. Betteridge, Paul N. Durrington et al. · The Lancet · 2004 · 3.8K citations
Early Experience With Pay-for-Performance
Meredith B. Rosenthal, Richard G. Frank, Zhonghe Li et al. · JAMA · 2005 · 627 citations
Health Professions, Health Administration, Health Services Administration +17
Pay for Performance in Commercial HMOs
Meredith B. Rosenthal, Bruce E. Landon, Sharon‐Lise T. Normand et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2006 · 359 citations · Full text