ROSA P · 2010 · 40 citations · 16 references
EngineeringAerospace EngineeringOperations ManagementAircraft DesignProcess DesignSafety EngineeringMission PlanningSafety ManagementSafety RequirementsSafety SystemsConformity AssessmentFlight OperationsMission ObjectivesMission-critical ObjectivesOperation Of AircraftOperational SafetyOperational SpecificationsProcedural Guidance
In complex human‑machine systems, operations, training, and standardization rely on elaborate procedures mandated by organizational management. The report examines procedure use and design and recommends the Four P's process to guide pilots toward logical, efficient, safe, and predictable mission execution. The Four‑P model and its procedural guidelines were developed from cockpit observations, interviews with airline management and pilots, discussions with a major airframe manufacturer, and analysis of accident and incident reports. Commitment to the Four‑P process yields internally consistent, less confusing procedures better respected by crews, leading to greater conformity, and the principles may extend to other high‑risk systems.
In complex human-machine systems, operations, training, and standardization depend on a elaborate set of procedures which are specified and mandated by the operational management of the organization. The intent is to provide guidance to the pilots, to ensure a logical, efficient, safe, and predictable means of carrying out the mission objectives. In this report the authors examine the issue of procedure use and design from a broad viewpoint. The authors recommend a process which we call 'The Four P's:' philosophy, policies, procedures, and practices. We believe that if an organization commits to this process, it can create a set of procedures that are more internally consistent, less confusing, better respected by the flight crews, and that will lead to greater conformity. The 'Four-P' model, and the guidelines for procedural development in appendix 1, resulted from cockpit observations, extensive interviews with airline management and pilots, interviews and discussion at one major airframe manufacturer, and an examination of accident and incident reports. Although this report is based on airline operations, we believe that the principles may be applicable to other complex, high-risk systems, such as nuclear power production, manufacturing process control, space flight, and military operations.
16
Flight-deck automation: promises and problems
Earl L. Wiener, Renwick E. Curry · Ergonomics · 1980 · 594 citations · Full text
Science, Values, and Human Judgment
Kenneth R. Hammond, Leonard Adelman · Science · 1976 · 217 citations