The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · 2024 · 94 citations · 33 references
MedicineCardiologyClinical Classification SystemsClinical EpidemiologyRisk AssessmentAtrial FibrillationCardiovascular DiseaseCardiovascular RiskCerebrovascular DiseaseStrokeThrombosisAtrial Fibrillation AssessmentAtrial Fibrillation Risk AssessmentReclassificationStroke Risk StratificationStroke Severity AssessmentStroke Severity Scoring
Background Contemporary data have shown a decrease in the ischaemic stroke risk associated with female sex in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We evaluated temporal trends in the predictive value of a non-sex CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc risk score (ie. CHA 2 DS 2 -VA). Methods The FinACAF study covers all patients with incident AF between 2007 and 2018 in Finland from all levels of care. The CHA 2 DS 2 -VA score was compared with the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc using continuous and category-based net reclassification indices (NRIs), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), c-statistics and decision curve analyses. Findings We identified 144,879 anticoagulant naïve patients with new-onset AF between 2007 and 2018 (49.9% women; mean age 72.1 years), of whom 3936 (2.7%) experienced ischaemic stroke during one-year follow-up. Based on both continuous and category-based NRIs, the CHA 2 DS 2 -VA score was inferior to the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc in the early years (−0.333 (95% CI −0.411 to −0.261) and −0.118 (95% CI −0.137 to −0.099), respectively). However, the differences attenuated over time, and by the end of the study period, the continuous NRI became non-significant (−0.093 (95% CI −0.165 to 0.032)), whereas the category-based NRI reversed in favor of the CHA 2 DS 2 -VA (0.070 (95% CI 0.048–0.087)). The IDI was non-significant in early years (0.0009 (95% CI −0.0024 to 0.0037)), but over time became statistically significant in favor of the CHA 2 DS 2 -VA score (0.0022 (95% CI 0.0001–0.0044)). The Cox models fitted with the CHA 2 DS 2 -VA and the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc scores exhibited comparable discriminative capability in the beginning of the study (p-value 0.63), but over time marginal differences in favor of the CHA 2 DS 2 -VA score emerged (p-value 0.0002). Interpretation In 2007–2008 (when females had higher AF-related stroke risks than males), the CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score outperformed the CHA 2 DS 2 -VA score, but the initial differences between the scores attenuated over time. By the end of the study period in 2017–2018 (with limited/no sex differences in AF-related stroke), there was marginal superiority for the CHA 2 DS 2 -VA score. Funding This work was supported by the Aarne Koskelo Foundation, The Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, The Finnish State Research funding, and Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District research fund.
33
Gerhard Hindricks, Tatjana Potpara, Nikolaos Dagres et al. · European Heart Journal · 2020 · 9.9K citations · Full text
Valery L. Feigin, Benjamin Stark, Catherine O. Johnson et al. · The Lancet Neurology · 2021 · 7.6K citations · Full text
José A. Joglar, Mina K. Chung, Anastasia L. Armbruster et al. · Circulation · 2023 · 2.4K citations · Full text