Genetic counseling workforce diversity, inclusion, and capacity in Australia and New Zealand

Abstract

Purpose: To understand diversity, inclusion, and capacity of genetic counselors (GCs) in Australasia (Australia and New Zealand). Methods: tests. Qualitative data were analyzed using inductive content analysis. Results: A total of 252 participants responded to the survey. A subset analysis of respondents residing in Australia demonstrated a lack of representation across various characteristics including sex, relationship status, caregiver status, location, country of birth, Aboriginal/Torres Strait Islander identity, language, and religion. Analysis of the full data set demonstrated that most respondents also perceived that the workforce was not representative across gender, sexual orientation, ethnicity, or disability. Respondents provided examples of existing inclusive practice. They also suggested workforce needs, such as promoting education and employment for minority communities, more visible diversity, accessible services for clients, and professional development for GCs. Using survey and reference data, we estimated approximately 346 full-time equivalent GCs working in clinical practice in Australasia. Conclusion: Our study provides a first step in illuminating GC workforce changes needed in Australasia regarding diversity, inclusion, and capacity. The survey may be of use internationally, enabling other countries to understand these issues within their jurisdiction, and supporting the international community in addressing these challenges.