Radiotherapy and Oncology · 2023 · 109 citations · 25 references
MedicineOncologyRadiation OncologyClinical Radiation OncologyPrecision OncologySurgical OncologyGastrointestinal Toxicity ManagementPancreatic CancerRadiation TherapyRadiobiological ConsiderationsStereotactic RadiotherapyToxicity ManagementAdaptive Dose EscalationAdaptive Stereotactic RadiotherapyBorderline Resectable DiseaseLate Toxicity GradingMagnetic Resonance-guided RadiotherapyPancreatic Cancer RadiotherapyStereotactic Ablative RadiotherapyStereotactic Radiotherapy Toxicity Assessment
Background and purposeRadiation dose escalation may improve local control (LC) and overall survival (OS) in select pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. We prospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of ablative stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreas cancer (LAPC). The primary endpoint of acute grade ≥ 3 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity definitely related to SMART was previously published with median follow-up (FU) 8.8 months from SMART. We now present more mature outcomes including OS and late toxicity.Materials and methodsThis prospective, multi-center, single-arm open-label phase 2 trial (NCT03621644) enrolled 136 patients (LAPC 56.6%; BRPC 43.4%) after ≥ 3 months of any chemotherapy without distant progression and CA19-9 ≤500 U/mL. SMART was delivered on a 0.35T MR-guided system prescribed to 50 Gy in 5 fractions (biologically effective dose10 [BED10]=100 Gy). Elective coverage was optional. Surgery and chemotherapy were permitted after SMART.ResultsMean age was 65.7 years (range, 36-85), induction FOLFIRINOX was common (81.7%), most received elective coverage (57.4%), and 34.6% had surgery after SMART. Median FU fwas 22.9 months from diagnosis and 14.2 months from SMART, respectively. 2-year OS from diagnosis and SMART were 53.6% and 40.5%, respectively. Late grade ≥ 3 toxicity definitely, probably, or possibly attributed to SMART were observed in 0%, 4.6%, and 11.5% patients, respectively.ConclusionsLong-term outcomes from the phase 2 SMART trial demonstrate encouraging OS and limited severe toxicity. Additional prospective evaluation of this novel strategy is warranted.
25
Rebecca L. Siegel, Kimberly D. Miller, Nikita Sandeep Wagle et al. · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2023 · 16.7K citations · Full text
Joseph M. Herman, Daniel T. Chang, Karyn A. Goodman et al. · Cancer · 2014 · 538 citations · Full text
Lauren E. Henke, Rojano Kashani, Clifford G. Robinson et al. · Radiotherapy and Oncology · 2017 · 426 citations · Full text