Scientific Reports · 2023 · 19 citations · 48 references
ComputingBiostatisticsOncologyFeature EngineeringMachine LearningPredictive AnalyticsBreast Cancer Risk AssessmentPolygenic Risk AssessmentRisk PredictionRisk ScoringRisk StratificationSurvival PredictionBreast Cancer Risk ModelsBreast Cancer Risk StratificationCancer Risk Prediction ModelsCox RegressionExtreme Gradient BoostingFeature ImportanceMachine Learning Prediction ModelsPredictive Risk Scoring
We aimed to identify potential novel predictors for breast cancer among post-menopausal women, with pre-specified interest in the role of polygenic risk scores (PRS) for risk prediction. We utilised an analysis pipeline where machine learning was used for feature selection, prior to risk prediction by classical statistical models. An "extreme gradient boosting" (XGBoost) machine with Shapley feature-importance measures were used for feature selection among [Formula: see text] 1.7 k features in 104,313 post-menopausal women from the UK Biobank. We constructed and compared the "augmented" Cox model (incorporating the two PRS, known and novel predictors) with a "baseline" Cox model (incorporating the two PRS and known predictors) for risk prediction. Both of the two PRS were significant in the augmented Cox model ([Formula: see text]). XGBoost identified 10 novel features, among which five showed significant associations with post-menopausal breast cancer: plasma urea (HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.98, [Formula: see text]), plasma phosphate (HR = 0.68, 95% CI 0.53-0.88, [Formula: see text]), basal metabolic rate (HR = 1.17, 95% CI 1.11-1.24, [Formula: see text]), red blood cell count (HR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.08-1.35, [Formula: see text]), and creatinine in urine (HR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.09, [Formula: see text]). Risk discrimination was maintained in the augmented Cox model, yielding C-index 0.673 vs 0.667 (baseline Cox model) with the training data and 0.665 vs 0.664 with the test data. We identified blood/urine biomarkers as potential novel predictors for post-menopausal breast cancer. Our findings provide new insights to breast cancer risk. Future research should validate novel predictors, investigate using multiple PRS and more precise anthropometry measures for better breast cancer risk prediction.
48
Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets
Christopher Chang, Carson C. Chow, Laurent CAM Tellier et al. · GigaScience · 2015 · 14K citations · Full text
The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data
Clare Bycroft, Colin Freeman, Desislava Petkova et al. · Nature · 2018 · 9.7K citations · Full text
LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree
Guolin Ke, Qi Meng, Thomas Finley et al. · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2017 · 9.5K citations · Full text