British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · 2022 · 16 citations · 17 references
Natural SciencesBehavioral SciencesEconometricsPsychometricsStatisticsGoodness-of-fit For Categorical ModelsHypothesis TestingInferential StatisticsModel ComparisonModel Fit AssessmentStatistical InferenceExplained VarianceGoodness-of-fit TestingLinear ModelsNested ModelsProbit RegressionRegression SurrogatesSurrogacy AlternativesSurrogate Metrics
Abstract Probit models are used extensively for inferential purposes in the social sciences as discrete data are prevalent in a vast body of social studies. Among many accompanying model inference problems, a critical question remains unsettled: how to develop a goodness‐of‐fit measure that resembles the ordinary least square (OLS) R 2 used for linear models. Such a measure has long been sought to achieve ‘comparability’ of different empirical models across multiple samples addressing similar social questions. To this end, we propose a novel R 2 measure for probit models using the notion of surrogacy – simulating a continuous variable as a surrogate of the original discrete response (Liu & Zhang, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 113, 845 and 2018). The proposed R 2 is the proportion of the variance of the surrogate response explained by explanatory variables through a linear model , and we call it a surrogate R 2 . This paper shows both theoretically and numerically that the surrogate R 2 approximates the OLS R 2 based on the latent continuous variable, preserves the interpretation of explained variation, and maintains monotonicity between nested models. As no other pseudo R 2 , McKelvey and Zavoina's and McFadden's included, can meet all the three criteria simultaneously, our measure fills this crucial void in probit model inference.
17
John G. Cragg, Paul Zarembka · Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique · 1975 · 8.4K citations
Modeling wine preferences by data mining from physicochemical properties
Paulo Cortez, A. L. Cerdeira, Fernando Almeida et al. · Decision Support Systems · 2009 · 1.3K citations · Full text