Publication | Closed Access
CASDD: Automatic Surface Defect Detection Using a Complementary Adversarial Network
40
Citations
39
References
2022
Year
Convolutional Neural NetworkEngineeringMachine LearningFeature DetectionComplementary Adversarial NetworkImage ClassificationImage AnalysisData SciencePattern RecognitionImage-based ModelingComputational ImagingMachine VisionComputer EngineeringComputer ScienceDeep LearningDefect DetectionAutomated InspectionComputer VisionSurface Defect DetectionGenerative Adversarial NetworkSegmentation Module
Surface defect detection (SDD) plays an extremely important role in the manufacturing stage of products. However, this is a fundamental yet challenging task, mainly because the intraclass defects have large differences in shape and distribution, and low contrast between the object regions and background, and it is difficult to adapt to other materials. To address this problem, we propose a complementary adversarial network-driven SDD (CASDD) framework to automatically and accurately identify various types of texture defects. Specifically, CASDD consists of an encoding–decoding segmentation module with a specially designed loss measurement and a novel complementary discriminator mechanism. In addition, to model the defect boundaries and enhance the feature representation, the dilated convolutional (DC) layers with different rates and edge detection (ED) blocks are also incorporated into CASDD. Moreover, a complementary discrimination strategy is proposed, which employs two independent yet complementary discriminator modules to optimize the segmentation module more effectively. One discriminator identifies contextual features of the object regions in the input defect images, while the other discriminator focuses on edge detail differences between the ground truth and the segmented image. To obtain more edge information during training, a new composite loss measurement containing edge information and structural features is designed. Experimental results show that CASDD can be suitable for defect detection on four real-world and one artificial defect database, and its detection accuracy is significantly better than the state-of-the-art deep learning methods.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1