2019 · 287 citations · 49 references
ComputingHuman Resource ManagementMachine LearningRecruitmentTheory Of JusticeAlgorithmic FairnessFairness In Machine LearningFairness In TestingTest FairnessFairnessFairness AnalysisFairness In ClassificationFairness In Educational TestingIndividual FairnessSocial ContextSubgroup FairnessTest Fairness Criteria
Quantitative definitions of what is unfair and what is fair have been introduced in multiple disciplines for well over 50 years, including in education, hiring, and machine learning. We trace how the notion of fairness has been defined within the testing communities of education and hiring over the past half century, exploring the cultural and social context in which different fairness definitions have emerged. In some cases, earlier definitions of fairness are similar or identical to definitions of fairness in current machine learning research, and foreshadow current formal work. In other cases, insights into what fairness means and how to measure it have largely gone overlooked. We compare past and current notions of fairness along several dimensions, including the fairness criteria, the focus of the criteria (e.g., a test, a model, or its use), the relationship of fairness to individuals, groups, and subgroups, and the mathematical method for measuring fairness (e.g., classification, regression). This work points the way towards future research and measurement of (un)fairness that builds from our modern understanding of fairness while incorporating insights from the past.
49
Cynthia Dwork, Moritz Hardt, Toniann Pitassi et al. · 2012 · 3.4K citations
Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Moritz Hardt, Eric Price, Nathan Srebro · arXiv (Cornell University) · 2016 · 1.9K citations · Full text