Frontiers in Oncology · 2022 · 20 citations · 26 references
MedicineOncologyPharmacologyChemotherapyPharmacogeneticsPharmacogenomicsCancer PharmacogenomicsChemotherapy PharmacogenomicsClinical Implementation Of PharmacogeneticsClinical Implementation Of PharmacogenomicsPharmacogenetic TestingPharmacogenomic TestingDpyd GenotypingGastrointestinal MalignancyHealth System ImplementationOpen-label TrialsPragmatic Trial DesignUgt1a1 GenotypeUgt1a1 GenotypingUgt1a1 Pharmacogenetics
Background: variants associated with reduced enzyme activity holds the potential to identify patients at high risk for severe chemotherapy-induced toxicity. Slow adoption of PGx testing in routine clinical care is due to implementation barriers, including long test turnaround times, lack of integration in the electronic health record (EHR), and ambiguity in test cost coverage. We sought to establish PGx testing in our health system following the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework as a guide. Our implementation study aims to address barriers to PGx testing. Methods: The Implementing Pharmacogenetic Testing in Gastrointestinal Cancers (IMPACT-GI) study is a non-randomized, pragmatic, open-label implementation study at three sites within a major academic health system. Eligible patients with a GI malignancy indicated for treatment with 5-FU, capecitabine, or irinotecan will undergo PGx testing prior to chemotherapy initiation. Specimens will be sent to an academic clinical laboratory followed by return of results in the EHR with appropriate clinical decision support for the care team. We hypothesize that the availability of a rapid turnaround PGx test with specific dosing recommendations will increase PGx test utilization to guide pharmacotherapy decisions and improve patient safety outcomes. Primary implementation endpoints are feasibility, fidelity, and penetrance. Exploratory analyses for clinical effectiveness of genotyping will include assessing grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicity using available clinical data, patient-reported outcomes, and quality of life measures. Conclusion: testing. Our prospective implementation study will evaluate the clinical implementation of this testing program and create the infrastructure necessary to ensure sustainability of PGx testing in our health system. The results of this study may help other institutions interested in implementing PGx testing in oncology care. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04736472, identifier [NCT04736472].
26
Paul A. Harris, Robert Taylor, Robert J. Thielke et al. · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · 2008 · 51.7K citations · Full text
Laura J. Damschroder, David C. Aron, Rosalind E. Keith et al. · Implementation Science · 2009 · 14.8K citations · Full text
Public Health, Health Services Administration, Health Services Research +15
ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Eric Van Cutsem, Andrés Cervantes, René Adam et al. · Annals of Oncology · 2016 · 3.4K citations · Full text
Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service Sectors
Gregory A. Aarons, Michael S. Hurlburt, Sarah McCue Horwitz · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · 2010 · 3.3K citations · Full text
Public Affairs, Public Administration, Evidence-based Practice +16
An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist
Mark S. Bauer, Laura J. Damschroder, Hildi Hagedorn et al. · BMC Psychology · 2015 · 2.1K citations · Full text